Moody’s Investors Service on Friday cut Greece‘s sovereign debt rating to the lowest possible level after a debt-restructuring deal that imposes hefty economic losses for private creditors.

Moody’s lowered Greece‘s local and foreign-currency bond ratings a notch to C from Ca, becoming the third credit rating agency to downgrade the country following the announcement of the swap deal to lighten its debt burden.

On Monday, Standard & Poor’s cut Greece’s long-term ratings to “selective default,” the second ratings agency to proceed with a widely expected downgrade after the country announced the bond swap.

Moody's downgrades Greece to C from Ca

London, 02 March 2012 -- Moody's Investors Service has today downgraded Greece's local- and foreign-currency bond ratings to C from Ca and has not assigned an outlook to the ratings. Today's rating decision was prompted by the recently announced debt exchange proposals for Greece, which imply expected losses to investors in excess of 70%, which is consistent with Moody's criteria for a C rating.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The announced debt exchange proposal implies that private creditors that participate will incur substantial economic losses on their holdings of Greek government debt. Moody's estimates that the percentage difference between the value of the coupon and principal promised by existing Greek government bonds and the value of the package investors will receive in the exchange exceeds 70%, which is consistent with a C rating. After the Eurogroup's assessment of Greece's adherence to bailout conditions has been finalised, debt exchanges have been completed and a new Memorandum of Understanding between the EU and the Greek government has been finalized and published, Moody's will re-assess the credit risk profile and ratings of any outstanding or new securities issued by the Greek government.

According to Moody's, the announced proposal for private-sector involvement, which is a precondition for the provision of further financial assistance from the euro area, would constitute a distressed exchange, and hence a default, on Greek government bonds. Moody's defines a distressed exchange as an exchange which results in losses to investors relative to the initial promise and an outright default is likely in the absence of the exchange.. Both these conditions are met in this case, given that private-sector involvement had been one precondition for Greece to obtain additional official financing and thus avoiding an outright payment default. The magnitude of investor losses will be determined by the difference between the face value and accrued interest of the debt exchanged and the market value of the cash or securities received. The exchange offer is subject to financing conditions and minimum participation rates; however, if the debt exchange is not undertaken as planned, investors are likely to experiences losses of similar magnitude nonetheless. Moody's expects further clarity on the execution of the exchange in early March.

Looking ahead, the EU programme and proposed debt exchanges will reduce Greece's debt burden, but the risk of a default even after the debt exchange has been completed remains high. Moody's believes that Greece will still face medium-term solvency challenges: its stock of debt will still be well in excess of 100% of GDP for many years; the country is unlikely to be able to access the private market once the second assistance package runs out; and its planned fiscal and economic reforms will still face very significant implementation risks. Moody's will consider these issues in the post-exchange re-assessment of Greece's credit risk profile.

Moody's decision not to assign an outlook to the rating is based on the very high likelihood of a default by the Greek government on its bonds and the fact that C is the lowest rating on Moody's rating scale.

WHAT COULD MOVE THE RATING UP

Moody's currently believes that if there are any upward movements in Greece's sovereign rating in the weeks after the debt exchange, they are likely to be small. For Greece's bond rating to rise above levels associated with very high probability of future default, the pace of fiscal consolidation and/or structural reform implementation would need to proceed much faster than is currently expected. A further precondition for a substantial upgrade also would be that the key drivers of the debt dynamics -- such as economic growth, interest rates, privatisation revenue, and the ability to generate and sustain large primary surpluses—were seen to be evolving in a way that would significantly accelerate the pace of debt reduction.

The principal methodology used in this rating was Sovereign Bond Ratings published in September 2008. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

The rating has been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.

Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following: parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings, and public information.

Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.

Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.

Moody's Investors Service may have provided Ancillary or Other Permissible Service(s) to the rated entity or its related third parties within the two years preceding the credit rating action. Please see the special report "Ancillary or other permissible services provided to entities rated by MIS's EU credit rating agencies" on the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation; however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.

Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.

Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.

The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.